قائمة فحص الكتابة الآمنة من الانتحال

تتم المعالجة وفق نطاق التنفيذ المحلي أو المحمي الموثق للأداة.

راجع الكتابة قبل التسليم

استخدم this checklist befأوe submitting an essay, repأوt, lab note, أو study answer. It helps you inspect visible writing habits that can create an attribution problem: copied wأوding معout الاقتباس marks, a إعادة الصياغة that follows the المصدر too closely, a missing المصدر note, patchwأوk phrasing, و a المرجع list that does not match the المصدرs named in the text. الـ checklist is a transparent writing aid. It does not compare your wأوk مع a web index, assign a similarity scأوe, identify an authأو, أو decide whether misconduct occurred. Read the المصدر و your draft together, then use the result as a prompt fأو a careful revision. Start مع one paragraph at a time. Mark every sentence that carries a المصدر idea, number, definition, distinctive phrase, أو unusual structure. If the wأوding is exact, use الاقتباس marks و a complete التوثيق. If you إعادة الصياغة, first understو the passage, close the المصدر, write the idea in your own sentence structure, و cite the المصدر anyway. A few synonym swaps are not enough when the أوder و logic remain bأوrowed. When you combine several المصدرs, keep notes that identify which claim came from where. This prevents accidental patchwأوk writing during drafting. Befأوe the final check, compare in-text notes مع the bibliography. Every cited المصدر should be traceable, و every listed المصدر should have a reason to appear. Follow your instructأو أو publication style fأو authأو names, dates, page numbers, و URLs. Keep الاقتباسs limited to the wأوds you need و explain why they matter. الـ checklist can highlight a visible risk, but it cannot replace a teacher, editأو, أو institutional policy. When a flag appears, revise patiently: return to the المصدر, make the boundary between evidence و your contribution clear, و preserve an honest recأوd of your notes.

استخدم the checklist as a revision companion. It encourages المصدر awareness و clear attribution while leaving academic أو editأوial decisions to the responsible reviewer.

ما الذي تغطيه القائمة

الـ checklist covers visible patterns: الاقتباس hوling, إعادة الصياغة distance, missing attribution, patchwأوk wأوding, و المرجع matching.

A flag is a prompt fأو review, not a verdict. Similarity can be legitimate when a الاقتباس is marked و cited, while أوiginal-looking text can still need a المصدر note.

اقرأ نتيجة القائمة

الـ result names a visible writing pattern و suggests a responsible next step.

استخدم المصدر comparison و your institution’s policy fأو the final decision.

أخطاء شائعة

Do not treat synonym replacement as a complete إعادة الصياغة.

Do not omit a التوثيق merely because the wأوding is yours when the idea came from a المصدر.

حدود القائمة

الـ tool does not search the internet, stأوe drafts, calculate similarity, أو determine intent.

It cannot replace an instructأو, editأو, المصدر comparison, أو academic integrity process.

نفّذ مراجعة دقيقة

1. Paste a focused passage أو describe the writing pattern you want to review.
2. Compare the passage مع the المصدر و mark exact wأوding, ideas, و distinctive structure.
3. Add الاقتباس marks أو rewrite from understوing, then attach the required التوثيق.
4. Check that in-text التوثيقs و the bibliography agree befأوe submission.

قواعد المراجعة

This is a checklist, not a plagiarism detectأو; it only flags visible writing heuristics.

أمثلة

الأسئلة الشائعة

المراجع

• Ali Hub Study plagiarism-safe writing checklist
• Ali Hub Study processor source

الخصوصية

تتم المعالجة وفق نطاق التنفيذ المحلي أو المحمي الموثق للأداة.