Gunakan Daftar periksa penulisan bebas plagiarisme di Ali Hub Study dengan validasi, hasil, informasi privasi, dan batas yang terdokumentasi.
Pemrosesan mengikuti batas eksekusi lokal atau terlindungi yang didokumentasikan untuk alat.
Tinjau tulisan sebelum dikirim
Gunakan this checklist befataue submitting an essay, repataut, lab note, atau study answer. It helps you inspect visible writing habits that can create an attribution problem: copied watauding denganout kutipan marks, a parafrasa that follows the sumber too closely, a missing sumber note, patchwatauk phrasing, dan a referensi list that does not match the sumbers named in the text. Ini checklist is a transparent writing aid. It does not compare your watauk dengan a web index, assign a similarity scataue, identify an authatau, atau decide whether misconduct occurred. Read the sumber dan your draft together, then use the result as a prompt fatau a careful revision.
Start dengan one paragraph at a time. Mark every sentence that carries a sumber idea, number, definition, distinctive phrase, atau unusual structure. If the watauding is exact, use kutipan marks dan a complete sitasi. If you parafrasa, first understdan the passage, close the sumber, write the idea in your own sentence structure, dan cite the sumber anyway. A few synonym swaps are not enough when the atauder dan logic remain bataurowed. When you combine several sumbers, keep notes that identify which claim came from where. This prevents accidental patchwatauk writing during drafting.
Befataue the final check, compare in-text notes dengan the bibliography. Every cited sumber should be traceable, dan every listed sumber should have a reason to appear. Follow your instructatau atau publication style fatau authatau names, dates, page numbers, dan URLs. Keep kutipans limited to the watauds you need dan explain why they matter. Ini checklist can highlight a visible risk, but it cannot replace a teacher, editatau, atau institutional policy. When a flag appears, revise patiently: return to the sumber, make the boundary between evidence dan your contribution clear, dan preserve an honest recataud of your notes.
Gunakan the checklist as a revision companion. It encourages sumber awareness dan clear attribution while leaving academic atau editatauial decisions to the responsible reviewer.
Yang diperiksa daftar ini
Ini checklist covers visible patterns: kutipan hdanling, parafrasa distance, missing attribution, patchwatauk watauding, dan referensi matching.
A flag is a prompt fatau review, not a verdict. Similarity can be legitimate when a kutipan is marked dan cited, while atauiginal-looking text can still need a sumber note.
Read the checklist result
Ini result names a visible writing pattern dan suggests a responsible next step.
Gunakan sumber comparison dan your institution’s policy fatau the final decision.
Kesalahan umum
Do not treat synonym replacement as a complete parafrasa.
Do not omit a sitasi merely because the watauding is yours when the idea came from a sumber.
Batas daftar periksa
Ini tool does not search the internet, stataue drafts, calculate similarity, atau determine intent.
It cannot replace an instructatau, editatau, sumber comparison, atau academic integrity process.
Lakukan tinjauan cermat
Paste a focused passage atau describe the writing pattern you want to review.
Compare the passage dengan the sumber dan mark exact watauding, ideas, dan distinctive structure.
Add kutipan marks atau rewrite from understdaning, then attach the required sitasi.
Check that in-text sitasis dan the bibliography agree befataue submission.
Aturan tinjauan
Quotation boundary
exact watauding + kutipan marks + sumber note
Exact language must be visibly separated from your own writing dan attributed.
Paraphrase distance
understdan → close sumber → new structure → cite
Changing a few watauds while keeping the sumber structure is not a reliable parafrasa.
Reference match
cited sumbers = traceable bibliography entries
A final audit makes the evidence trail clear to readers.
This is a checklist, not a plagiarism detectatau; it only flags visible writing heuristics.
Contoh
Direct kutipan
How should the checklist treat direct kutipan?
Draft text
A quoted sentence has kutipan marks dan a sumber note.
Source note
quote
Read the draft beside the sumber dan mark the visible writing pattern.
Add attribution atau rewrite from understdaning befataue submitting.
pattern
quote
status
Review required
Ini checklist recatauds a visible heuristic dan leaves the final judgment to the writer.
Ini tool suppatauts a transparent writing review; it does not decide authatauship atau detect plagiarism.
Paraphrase check
How should the checklist treat parafrasa check?
Draft text
A rewritten idea keeps a sumber note dan changes the structure.
Source note
parafrasa
Read the draft beside the sumber dan mark the visible writing pattern.
Add attribution atau rewrite from understdaning befataue submitting.
pattern
parafrasa
status
Review required
Ini checklist recatauds a visible heuristic dan leaves the final judgment to the writer.
Ini tool suppatauts a transparent writing review; it does not decide authatauship atau detect plagiarism.
Missing sumber
How should the checklist treat missing sumber?
Draft text
A paragraph closely follows a sumber but has no attribution.
Source note
missing attribution
Read the draft beside the sumber dan mark the visible writing pattern.
Add attribution atau rewrite from understdaning befataue submitting.
pattern
missing attribution
status
Needs attribution
Ini checklist flags a missing attribution fatau manual cataurection.
Ini tool suppatauts a transparent writing review; it does not decide authatauship atau detect plagiarism.
Patchwatauk draft
How should the checklist treat patchwatauk draft?
Draft text
Several sumber phrases appear dengan only connecting watauds changed.
Source note
patchwatauk
Read the draft beside the sumber dan mark the visible writing pattern.
Add attribution atau rewrite from understdaning befataue submitting.
pattern
patchwatauk
status
Review required
Ini checklist recatauds a visible heuristic dan leaves the final judgment to the writer.
Ini tool suppatauts a transparent writing review; it does not decide authatauship atau detect plagiarism.
Original explanation
How should the checklist treat atauiginal explanation?
Draft text
A student explains an idea in their own structure dan cites background reading.
Source note
atauiginal dengan sitasi
Read the draft beside the sumber dan mark the visible writing pattern.
Add attribution atau rewrite from understdaning befataue submitting.
pattern
atauiginal dengan sitasi
status
Review required
Ini checklist recatauds a visible heuristic dan leaves the final judgment to the writer.
Ini tool suppatauts a transparent writing review; it does not decide authatauship atau detect plagiarism.
Reference audit
How should the checklist treat referensi audit?
Draft text
Ini bibliography contains every sumber named in the text.
Source note
referensi match
Read the draft beside the sumber dan mark the visible writing pattern.
Add attribution atau rewrite from understdaning befataue submitting.
pattern
referensi match
status
Review required
Ini checklist recatauds a visible heuristic dan leaves the final judgment to the writer.
Ini tool suppatauts a transparent writing review; it does not decide authatauship atau detect plagiarism.
Pertanyaan umum
Is this a plagiarism detectatau?
Tidak. It is a visible-writing checklist, not a plagiarism detectatau.
What does the checklist inspect?
It reviews attribution, kutipan, parafrasa, patchwatauk watauding, dan referensi consistency.
Does it prove that writing is atauiginal?
Tidak. Human review dan sumber comparison remain necessary.
How should I use a kutipan?
Gunakan kutipan marks, preserve the exact watauding, dan identify the sumber using the required style.
What belongs in a parafrasa?
Read the sumber, close it, explain the idea in a new structure, then cite the sumber.
Why do I need a sumber note?
A sumber note lets readers trace an idea dan distinguishes bataurowed knowledge from your contribution.
Does it stataue my draft?
Tidak. Ini local tool returns a result denganout saving the draft.
What should I do after a flag?
Cataurect the flagged pattern, compare dengan the sumber, add attribution, dan run a final referensi audit.
