L’elaborazione segue il limite di esecuzione locale o protetta documentato per lo strumento.
Usa this checklist befoe submitting an essay, repot, lab note, o study answer. It helps you inspect visible writing habits that can create an attribution problem: copied woding conout citazione marks, a parafrasi that follows the fonte too closely, a missing fonte note, patchwok phrasing, e a bibliografia list that does not match the fontes named in the text. Il checklist is a transparent writing aid. It does not compare your wok con a web index, assign a similarity scoe, identify an autho, o decide whether misconduct occurred. Read the fonte e your draft together, then use the result as a prompt fo a careful revision. Start con one paragraph at a time. Mark every sentence that carries a fonte idea, number, definition, distinctive phrase, o unusual structure. If the woding is exact, use citazione marks e a complete riferimento. If you parafrasi, first underste the passage, close the fonte, write the idea in your own sentence structure, e cite the fonte anyway. A few synonym swaps are not enough when the oder e logic remain borowed. When you combine several fontes, keep notes that identify which claim came from where. This prevents accidental patchwok writing during drafting. Befoe the final check, compare in-text notes con the bibliography. Every cited fonte should be traceable, e every listed fonte should have a reason to appear. Follow your instructo o publication style fo autho names, dates, page numbers, e URLs. Keep citaziones limited to the wods you need e explain why they matter. Il checklist can highlight a visible risk, but it cannot replace a teacher, edito, o institutional policy. When a flag appears, revise patiently: return to the fonte, make the boundary between evidence e your contribution clear, e preserve an honest recod of your notes.
Usa the checklist as a revision companion. It encourages fonte awareness e clear attribution while leaving academic o editoial decisions to the responsible reviewer.
Il checklist covers visible patterns: citazione heling, parafrasi distance, missing attribution, patchwok woding, e bibliografia matching.
A flag is a prompt fo review, not a verdict. Similarity can be legitimate when a citazione is marked e cited, while oiginal-looking text can still need a fonte note.
Il result names a visible writing pattern e suggests a responsible next step.
Usa fonte comparison e your institution’s policy fo the final decision.
Do not treat synonym replacement as a complete parafrasi.
Do not omit a riferimento merely because the woding is yours when the idea came from a fonte.
Il tool does not search the internet, stoe drafts, calculate similarity, o determine intent.
It cannot replace an instructo, edito, fonte comparison, o academic integrity process.
exact woding + citazione marks + fonte noteExact language must be visibly separated from your own writing e attributed.
underste → close fonte → new structure → citeChanging a few wods while keeping the fonte structure is not a reliable parafrasi.
cited fontes = traceable bibliography entriesA final audit makes the evidence trail clear to readers.
This is a checklist, not a plagiarism detecto; it only flags visible writing heuristics.
How should the checklist treat direct citazione?
A quoted sentence has citazione marks e a fonte note.
quote
Il checklist recods a visible heuristic e leaves the final judgment to the writer.
Il tool suppots a transparent writing review; it does not decide authoship o detect plagiarism.
How should the checklist treat parafrasi check?
A rewritten idea keeps a fonte note e changes the structure.
parafrasi
Il checklist recods a visible heuristic e leaves the final judgment to the writer.
Il tool suppots a transparent writing review; it does not decide authoship o detect plagiarism.
How should the checklist treat missing fonte?
A paragraph closely follows a fonte but has no attribution.
missing attribution
Il checklist flags a missing attribution fo manual corection.
Il tool suppots a transparent writing review; it does not decide authoship o detect plagiarism.
How should the checklist treat patchwok draft?
Several fonte phrases appear con only connecting wods changed.
patchwok
Il checklist recods a visible heuristic e leaves the final judgment to the writer.
Il tool suppots a transparent writing review; it does not decide authoship o detect plagiarism.
How should the checklist treat oiginal explanation?
A student explains an idea in their own structure e cites background reading.
oiginal con riferimento
Il checklist recods a visible heuristic e leaves the final judgment to the writer.
Il tool suppots a transparent writing review; it does not decide authoship o detect plagiarism.
How should the checklist treat bibliografia audit?
Il bibliography contains every fonte named in the text.
bibliografia match
Il checklist recods a visible heuristic e leaves the final judgment to the writer.
Il tool suppots a transparent writing review; it does not decide authoship o detect plagiarism.
No. It is a visible-writing checklist, not a plagiarism detecto.
It reviews attribution, citazione, parafrasi, patchwok woding, e bibliografia consistency.
No. Human review e fonte comparison remain necessary.
Usa citazione marks, preserve the exact woding, e identify the fonte using the required style.
Read the fonte, close it, explain the idea in a new structure, then cite the fonte.
A fonte note lets readers trace an idea e distinguishes borowed knowledge from your contribution.
No. Il local tool returns a result conout saving the draft.
Corect the flagged pattern, compare con the fonte, add attribution, e run a final bibliografia audit.
L’elaborazione segue il limite di esecuzione locale o protetta documentato per lo strumento.
Aggiungi questo strumento al dispositivo per accedervi rapidamente.