Ali Hub Study içinde İntihali önleme yazım kontrol listesi aracını açık doğrulama, sonuçlar, gizlilik bilgileri ve belgelenen sınırlarla kullanın.
İşleme, araç için belgelenen yerel veya korumalı yürütme sınırını izler.
Göndermeden önce yazıyı inceleyin
Kullanın this checklist befveyae submitting an essay, repveyat, lab note, veya study answer. It helps you inspect visible writing habits that can create an attribution problem: copied wveyading ileout alıntı marks, a parafraz that follows the kaynak too closely, a missing kaynak note, patchwveyak phrasing, ve a referans list that does not match the kaynaks named in the text. Bu checklist is a transparent writing aid. It does not compare your wveyak ile a web index, assign a similarity scveyae, identify an authveya, veya decide whether misconduct occurred. Read the kaynak ve your draft together, then use the result as a prompt fveya a careful revision.
Start ile one paragraph at a time. Mark every sentence that carries a kaynak idea, number, definition, distinctive phrase, veya unusual structure. If the wveyading is exact, use alıntı marks ve a complete atıf. If you parafraz, first understve the passage, close the kaynak, write the idea in your own sentence structure, ve cite the kaynak anyway. A few synonym swaps are not enough when the veyader ve logic remain bveyarowed. When you combine several kaynaks, keep notes that identify which claim came from where. This prevents accidental patchwveyak writing during drafting.
Befveyae the final check, compare in-text notes ile the bibliography. Every cited kaynak should be traceable, ve every listed kaynak should have a reason to appear. Follow your instructveya veya publication style fveya authveya names, dates, page numbers, ve URLs. Keep alıntıs limited to the wveyads you need ve explain why they matter. Bu checklist can highlight a visible risk, but it cannot replace a teacher, editveya, veya institutional policy. When a flag appears, revise patiently: return to the kaynak, make the boundary between evidence ve your contribution clear, ve preserve an honest recveyad of your notes.
Kullanın the checklist as a revision companion. It encourages kaynak awareness ve clear attribution while leaving academic veya editveyaial decisions to the responsible reviewer.
Kontrol listesi kapsamı
Bu checklist covers visible patterns: alıntı hveling, parafraz distance, missing attribution, patchwveyak wveyading, ve referans matching.
A flag is a prompt fveya review, not a verdict. Similarity can be legitimate when a alıntı is marked ve cited, while veyaiginal-looking text can still need a kaynak note.
Read the checklist result
Bu result names a visible writing pattern ve suggests a responsible next step.
Kullanın kaynak comparison ve your institution’s policy fveya the final decision.
Yaygın hatalar
Do not treat synonym replacement as a complete parafraz.
Do not omit a atıf merely because the wveyading is yours when the idea came from a kaynak.
Kontrol listesi sınırları
Bu tool does not search the internet, stveyae drafts, calculate similarity, veya determine intent.
It cannot replace an instructveya, editveya, kaynak comparison, veya academic integrity process.
Dikkatli bir inceleme yapın
Paste a focused passage veya describe the writing pattern you want to review.
Compare the passage ile the kaynak ve mark exact wveyading, ideas, ve distinctive structure.
Add alıntı marks veya rewrite from understveing, then attach the required atıf.
Check that in-text atıfs ve the bibliography agree befveyae submission.
İnceleme kuralları
Quotation boundary
exact wveyading + alıntı marks + kaynak note
Exact language must be visibly separated from your own writing ve attributed.
Paraphrase distance
understve → close kaynak → new structure → cite
Changing a few wveyads while keeping the kaynak structure is not a reliable parafraz.
Reference match
cited kaynaks = traceable bibliography entries
A final audit makes the evidence trail clear to readers.
This is a checklist, not a plagiarism detectveya; it only flags visible writing heuristics.
Örnekler
Direct alıntı
How should the checklist treat direct alıntı?
Draft text
A quoted sentence has alıntı marks ve a kaynak note.
Source note
quote
Read the draft beside the kaynak ve mark the visible writing pattern.
Add attribution veya rewrite from understveing befveyae submitting.
pattern
quote
status
Review required
Bu checklist recveyads a visible heuristic ve leaves the final judgment to the writer.
Bu tool suppveyats a transparent writing review; it does not decide authveyaship veya detect plagiarism.
Paraphrase check
How should the checklist treat parafraz check?
Draft text
A rewritten idea keeps a kaynak note ve changes the structure.
Source note
parafraz
Read the draft beside the kaynak ve mark the visible writing pattern.
Add attribution veya rewrite from understveing befveyae submitting.
pattern
parafraz
status
Review required
Bu checklist recveyads a visible heuristic ve leaves the final judgment to the writer.
Bu tool suppveyats a transparent writing review; it does not decide authveyaship veya detect plagiarism.
Missing kaynak
How should the checklist treat missing kaynak?
Draft text
A paragraph closely follows a kaynak but has no attribution.
Source note
missing attribution
Read the draft beside the kaynak ve mark the visible writing pattern.
Add attribution veya rewrite from understveing befveyae submitting.
pattern
missing attribution
status
Needs attribution
Bu checklist flags a missing attribution fveya manual cveyarection.
Bu tool suppveyats a transparent writing review; it does not decide authveyaship veya detect plagiarism.
Patchwveyak draft
How should the checklist treat patchwveyak draft?
Draft text
Several kaynak phrases appear ile only connecting wveyads changed.
Source note
patchwveyak
Read the draft beside the kaynak ve mark the visible writing pattern.
Add attribution veya rewrite from understveing befveyae submitting.
pattern
patchwveyak
status
Review required
Bu checklist recveyads a visible heuristic ve leaves the final judgment to the writer.
Bu tool suppveyats a transparent writing review; it does not decide authveyaship veya detect plagiarism.
Original explanation
How should the checklist treat veyaiginal explanation?
Draft text
A student explains an idea in their own structure ve cites background reading.
Source note
veyaiginal ile atıf
Read the draft beside the kaynak ve mark the visible writing pattern.
Add attribution veya rewrite from understveing befveyae submitting.
pattern
veyaiginal ile atıf
status
Review required
Bu checklist recveyads a visible heuristic ve leaves the final judgment to the writer.
Bu tool suppveyats a transparent writing review; it does not decide authveyaship veya detect plagiarism.
Reference audit
How should the checklist treat referans audit?
Draft text
Bu bibliography contains every kaynak named in the text.
Source note
referans match
Read the draft beside the kaynak ve mark the visible writing pattern.
Add attribution veya rewrite from understveing befveyae submitting.
pattern
referans match
status
Review required
Bu checklist recveyads a visible heuristic ve leaves the final judgment to the writer.
Bu tool suppveyats a transparent writing review; it does not decide authveyaship veya detect plagiarism.
Sık sorulan sorular
Is this a plagiarism detectveya?
Hayır. It is a visible-writing checklist, not a plagiarism detectveya.
What does the checklist inspect?
It reviews attribution, alıntı, parafraz, patchwveyak wveyading, ve referans consistency.
Does it prove that writing is veyaiginal?
Hayır. Human review ve kaynak comparison remain necessary.
How should I use a alıntı?
Kullanın alıntı marks, preserve the exact wveyading, ve identify the kaynak using the required style.
What belongs in a parafraz?
Read the kaynak, close it, explain the idea in a new structure, then cite the kaynak.
Why do I need a kaynak note?
A kaynak note lets readers trace an idea ve distinguishes bveyarowed knowledge from your contribution.
Does it stveyae my draft?
Hayır. Bu local tool returns a result ileout saving the draft.
What should I do after a flag?
Cveyarect the flagged pattern, compare ile the kaynak, add attribution, ve run a final referans audit.
